July 1 (UPI) -- Since the start of Russia's war on Ukraine in late February, Russian Internet users have experienced what has been dubbed the descent of a "digital iron curtain." Russian authorities blocked access to all major opposition news sites, as well as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. Under the new draconian laws purporting to combat fake news about the Russian-Ukrainian war, Internet users have faced administrative and criminal charges for allegedly spreading online disinformation about Russia's actions in Ukraine. Most Western technology companies, from Airbnb to Apple, have stopped or limited their Russian operations as part of the broader corporate exodus from the country. Advertisement Many Russians downloaded virtual private network software to try to access blocked sites and services in the first weeks of the war. By late April, 23% of Russian Internet users reported using VPNs with varying regularity. The state media watchdog, Roskomnadzor, has been blocking VPNs to prevent people from bypassing government censorship and stepped up its efforts in June. Advertisement Although the speed and scale of the wartime Internet crackdown are unprecedented, its legal, technical and rhetorical foundations were put in place during the preceding decade under the banner of digital sovereignty. RELATED At least 18 dead after Russian missiles strike coastal city in far south Ukraine Digital sovereignty for nations is the exercise of state power within national borders over digital processes like the flow of online data and content, surveillance and privacy, and the production of digital technologies. Under authoritarian regimes like today's Russia, digital sovereignty often serves as a veil for stymieing domestic dissent. Digital sovereignty pioneer Russia has advocated upholding state sovereignty over information and telecommunications since the early 1990s. In the aftermath of the Cold War, a weakened Russia could no longer compete with the United States economically, technologically or militarily. Instead, Russian leaders sought to curtail the emergent U.S. global dominance and hold on to Russia's great power status. RELATED Russian attack on Mariupol, Ukraine, theater a war crime, report says They did so by promoting the pre-eminence of state sovereignty as a foundational principle of international order. In the 2000s, seeking to project its great power resurgence, Moscow joined forces with Beijing to spearhead the global movement for internet sovereignty. Despite its decades-long advocacy of digital sovereignty on the world stage, the Kremlin didn't begin enforcing state power over its domestic cyberspace until the early 2010s. From late 2011 to mid-2012, Russia saw the largest series of anti-government rallies in its post-Soviet history to protest Vladimir Putin's third presidential run and fraudulent parliamentary elections. As in the anti-authoritarian uprisings in the Middle East known as the Arab Spring, the Internet served as a critical instrument in organizing and coordinating the Russian protests. Advertisement Following Putin's return to the presidency in March 2012, the Kremlin turned its attention to controlling Russian cyberspace. The so-called Blacklist Law established a framework for blocking websites under the guise of fighting child pornography, suicide, extremism and other widely acknowledged societal ills. RELATED WNBA star Brittney Griner's release uncertain as trial begins in Russia However, the law has been regularly used to ban sites of opposition activists and media. The law widely known as the Blogger's Law then subjected all websites and social media accounts with over 3,000 daily users to traditional media regulations by requiring them to register with the state. The next pivotal moment in Moscow's embrace of authoritarian digital sovereignty came after Russia's invasion of eastern Ukraine in the spring of 2014. Over the following five years, as Russia's relations with the West worsened, the Russian government undertook a barrage of initiatives meant to tighten its control over the country's increasingly networked public. The data localization law, for example, required foreign technology companies to keep Russian citizens' data on servers located within the country and thus easily accessible to the authorities. Under the pretext of fighting terrorism, another law required telecom and Internet companies to retain users' communications for six months and their metadata for three years and hand them over to authorities upon request without a court order. Advertisement The Kremlin has used these and other legal innovations to open criminal cases against thousands of Internet users and jail hundreds for "liking" and sharing social media content critical of the government. Sovereign Internet Law In April 2019, Russian authorities took their aspirations for digital sovereignty to another level with the so-called Sovereign Internet Law. The law opened the door for abuse of individual users and isolation of the Internet community as a whole. The law requires all Internet service providers to install state-mandated devices "for counteracting threats to stability, security and the functional integrity of the Internet" within Russian borders. The Russian government has interpreted threats broadly, including social media content. For example, the authorities have repeatedly used this law to throttle the performance of Twitter on mobile devices when Twitter has failed to comply with government requests to remove "illegal" content. Further, the law establishes protocols for rerouting all Internet traffic through Russian territory and for a single command center to manage that traffic. Ironically, the Moscow-based center that now controls traffic and fights foreign circumvention tools, such as the Tor browser, requires Chinese and U.S. hardware and software to function in the absence of their Russian equivalents. Advertisement Lastly, the law promises to establish a Russian national Domain Name System. DNS is the global Internet's core database that translates between web names such as theconversation.com and their Internet addresses, in this case 151.101.2.133. DNS is operated by a California-based nonprofit, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. At the time of the law's passing, Putin justified the national DNS by arguing that it would allow the Russian Internet segment to function even if ICANN disconnected Russia from the global Internet in an act of hostility. In practice, when, days into Russia's invasion in February, Ukrainian authorities asked ICANN to disconnect Russia from the DNS, ICANN declined the request. ICANN officials said they wanted to avoid setting the precedent of disconnecting entire countries for political reasons. Splitting global Internet The Russian-Ukrainian war has undermined the integrity of the global Internet, both by Russia's actions and the actions of technology companies in the West. In an unprecedented move, social media platforms have blocked access to Russian state media. The Internet is a global network of networks. Interoperability among these networks is the Internet's foundational principle. The ideal of a single Internet, of course, has always run up against the reality of the world's cultural and linguistic diversity: Unsurprisingly, most users don't clamor for content from faraway lands in unintelligible languages. Yet, politically motivated restrictions threaten to fragment the Internet into increasingly disjointed networks. Advertisement Though it may not be fought over on the battlefield, global interconnectivity has become one of the values at stake in the Russian-Ukrainian war. And as Russia has solidified its control over sections of eastern Ukraine, it has moved the digital iron curtain to those frontiers. Stanislav Budnitsky is a postdoctoral fellow in global and international studies at Indiana University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author. Topics War in Ukraine Latest Headlines Voices // 1 day ago WNBA star Brittney Griner's release uncertain as trial begins in Russia June 30 (UPI) -- Although a Russian court ruled that WNBA star Brittney Griner's detention may be extended for six more months, her trial on drug charges begins Friday, giving her supporters hope that her release is possible. Voices // 2 days ago America's two-front defense strategy is a ticking time bomb Warning to the Biden administration, looking at threats from Russia and China: Those who start two-front wars lose. Voices // 3 days ago Supreme Court's football decision is a game-changer on school prayer June 28 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court effectively gave individual employees' prayer the thumbs-up in a ruling this week -- potentially ushering in more religious activities in public schools. Voices // 4 days ago Gunboat diplomacy: Iran ramps up aggression in Strait of Hormuz June 27 (UPI) -- Gunboat diplomacy is defined in terms of international politics as the pursuit of foreign policy objectives by displaying signs of aggressive naval power, implying the threat of warfare if agreeable terms are not met. Voices // 1 week ago Red flag laws saved 7,300 Americans from gun deaths in 2020 alone June 24 (UPI) -- Congress is poised to pass the first gun control legislation in three decades. Among the elements in that legislation is support for states to pass what are called "red flag laws." Voices // 1 week ago Supreme Court shifting view on state funds for students at religious schools June 23 (UPI) -- For nearly three-quarters of a century, one issue in education has come up before the Supreme Court more than any other: disputes over religion. Voices // 1 week ago If Donald Trump were convicted, Joe Biden would have to consider a pardon June 22 (UPI) -- President Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon after the Watergate fiasco no doubt helped Jimmy Carter win the 1976 election. But Ford was right then and right now. Voices // 1 week ago BTS caught between Korea's soft power ambitions and national security June 21 (UPI) -- The decision by K-pop sensation BTS to take a hiatus is breaking hearts globally. But, unlike the Beatles or One Direction, their decision is tied to Korean politics and national security. Voices // 1 week ago 'Big lie' vigilantism is on the rise; big tech is failing to respond June 20 (UPI) -- Stolen-election activists and supporters of former President Donald Trump have embraced a new tactic in their campaign to unearth supposed proof of fraud in the 2020 presidential race. Voices // 2 weeks ago Colombia election: Trump-like populist vs. leftist ex-guerrilla for president June 17 (UPI) -- Colombians will decide their next president on Sunday with a choice between two candidates promising "change." But what they mean by change is very, very different.
July 1 (UPI) -- Since the start of Russia's war on Ukraine in late February, Russian Internet users have experienced what has been dubbed the descent of a "digital iron curtain."
Russian authorities blocked access to all major opposition news sites, as well as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. Under the new draconian laws purporting to combat fake news about the Russian-Ukrainian war, Internet users have faced administrative and criminal charges for allegedly spreading online disinformation about Russia's actions in Ukraine. Most Western technology companies, from Airbnb to Apple, have stopped or limited their Russian operations as part of the broader corporate exodus from the country. Advertisement
Many Russians downloaded virtual private network software to try to access blocked sites and services in the first weeks of the war. By late April, 23% of Russian Internet users reported using VPNs with varying regularity. The state media watchdog, Roskomnadzor, has been blocking VPNs to prevent people from bypassing government censorship and stepped up its efforts in June. Advertisement
Although the speed and scale of the wartime Internet crackdown are unprecedented, its legal, technical and rhetorical foundations were put in place during the preceding decade under the banner of digital sovereignty. RELATED At least 18 dead after Russian missiles strike coastal city in far south Ukraine
Digital sovereignty for nations is the exercise of state power within national borders over digital processes like the flow of online data and content, surveillance and privacy, and the production of digital technologies. Under authoritarian regimes like today's Russia, digital sovereignty often serves as a veil for stymieing domestic dissent.
Russia has advocated upholding state sovereignty over information and telecommunications since the early 1990s. In the aftermath of the Cold War, a weakened Russia could no longer compete with the United States economically, technologically or militarily. Instead, Russian leaders sought to curtail the emergent U.S. global dominance and hold on to Russia's great power status. RELATED Russian attack on Mariupol, Ukraine, theater a war crime, report says
They did so by promoting the pre-eminence of state sovereignty as a foundational principle of international order. In the 2000s, seeking to project its great power resurgence, Moscow joined forces with Beijing to spearhead the global movement for internet sovereignty.
Despite its decades-long advocacy of digital sovereignty on the world stage, the Kremlin didn't begin enforcing state power over its domestic cyberspace until the early 2010s. From late 2011 to mid-2012, Russia saw the largest series of anti-government rallies in its post-Soviet history to protest Vladimir Putin's third presidential run and fraudulent parliamentary elections. As in the anti-authoritarian uprisings in the Middle East known as the Arab Spring, the Internet served as a critical instrument in organizing and coordinating the Russian protests. Advertisement
Following Putin's return to the presidency in March 2012, the Kremlin turned its attention to controlling Russian cyberspace. The so-called Blacklist Law established a framework for blocking websites under the guise of fighting child pornography, suicide, extremism and other widely acknowledged societal ills. RELATED WNBA star Brittney Griner's release uncertain as trial begins in Russia
However, the law has been regularly used to ban sites of opposition activists and media. The law widely known as the Blogger's Law then subjected all websites and social media accounts with over 3,000 daily users to traditional media regulations by requiring them to register with the state.
The next pivotal moment in Moscow's embrace of authoritarian digital sovereignty came after Russia's invasion of eastern Ukraine in the spring of 2014. Over the following five years, as Russia's relations with the West worsened, the Russian government undertook a barrage of initiatives meant to tighten its control over the country's increasingly networked public.
The data localization law, for example, required foreign technology companies to keep Russian citizens' data on servers located within the country and thus easily accessible to the authorities. Under the pretext of fighting terrorism, another law required telecom and Internet companies to retain users' communications for six months and their metadata for three years and hand them over to authorities upon request without a court order. Advertisement
The Kremlin has used these and other legal innovations to open criminal cases against thousands of Internet users and jail hundreds for "liking" and sharing social media content critical of the government.
In April 2019, Russian authorities took their aspirations for digital sovereignty to another level with the so-called Sovereign Internet Law. The law opened the door for abuse of individual users and isolation of the Internet community as a whole.
The law requires all Internet service providers to install state-mandated devices "for counteracting threats to stability, security and the functional integrity of the Internet" within Russian borders. The Russian government has interpreted threats broadly, including social media content.
For example, the authorities have repeatedly used this law to throttle the performance of Twitter on mobile devices when Twitter has failed to comply with government requests to remove "illegal" content.
Further, the law establishes protocols for rerouting all Internet traffic through Russian territory and for a single command center to manage that traffic. Ironically, the Moscow-based center that now controls traffic and fights foreign circumvention tools, such as the Tor browser, requires Chinese and U.S. hardware and software to function in the absence of their Russian equivalents. Advertisement
Lastly, the law promises to establish a Russian national Domain Name System. DNS is the global Internet's core database that translates between web names such as theconversation.com and their Internet addresses, in this case 151.101.2.133. DNS is operated by a California-based nonprofit, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.
At the time of the law's passing, Putin justified the national DNS by arguing that it would allow the Russian Internet segment to function even if ICANN disconnected Russia from the global Internet in an act of hostility. In practice, when, days into Russia's invasion in February, Ukrainian authorities asked ICANN to disconnect Russia from the DNS, ICANN declined the request. ICANN officials said they wanted to avoid setting the precedent of disconnecting entire countries for political reasons.
The Russian-Ukrainian war has undermined the integrity of the global Internet, both by Russia's actions and the actions of technology companies in the West. In an unprecedented move, social media platforms have blocked access to Russian state media.
The Internet is a global network of networks. Interoperability among these networks is the Internet's foundational principle. The ideal of a single Internet, of course, has always run up against the reality of the world's cultural and linguistic diversity: Unsurprisingly, most users don't clamor for content from faraway lands in unintelligible languages. Yet, politically motivated restrictions threaten to fragment the Internet into increasingly disjointed networks. Advertisement
Though it may not be fought over on the battlefield, global interconnectivity has become one of the values at stake in the Russian-Ukrainian war. And as Russia has solidified its control over sections of eastern Ukraine, it has moved the digital iron curtain to those frontiers.
Stanislav Budnitsky is a postdoctoral fellow in global and international studies at Indiana University.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.